The King’s Speech

Cool that I’m reviewing a movie that is still playing! Quite rare for me to do that even if I have reviewed Black Swan and Tron: Legacy…
Anyways, was expecting good things from this film, but exactly what good things I had not known. It lived up to my expectations and then to a bit more, as the topic was many times more interesting than I had thought it would be. Perhaps my favourite part of this film is not the acting, although that is very, very good as well, but the subject matter and story. I had little knowledge whatsoever of speech problems and stammering, and even less knowledge of the line of royalty in Britain, so to be able to learn about King George VI’s struggles was quite an eye-opener and made me appreciate monarchy that much more (the first round of my appreciation came from The Queen). After watching this, I read up a bit on King George VI and found him thoroughly admirable and quite amazing. Oh, and please do watch this video of the actual King George VI making a speech, he’s quite good.
The second part that I liked very, very much was the art direction. Some very, very good shots in the film, really, even if the setting is admittedly not as exciting as outdoor sceneries. I especially liked the parts with lots of fog, whether in the street with cars or in a massive park with well-dressed people (the screenshot above illustrates in part the latter). While watching the latter scene, I really thought that it looked much like a painting I had seen, but could not pinpoint which work or artist. I still can’t really, but I think that Caillebotte’s works are a good approximation. The white, light greys, well-dressed people, and silhouettes in The King’s Speech seem quite similar to Caillebotte’s style in some works, and especially in others. Too bad the movie’s not out officially yet, or many screenshots would have been made…
Another thing that is very much worth mentioning are the performances, of course. Colin Firth was of course very good, and actually, this is my first time seeing him in a leading role. He did super well with the stammering and even more with the emotional scenes - I could almost feel his internal struggles (and of course the harsh monarchy setting helped). Geoffrey Rush was quite good as Logue, and I liked that he really seemed quite understanding. His character also had some endearing sons and client. Helena Bonham Carter as great in her supporting role. She didn’t steal the scene, but she complemented every scene very well and I very much enjoyed watching her whenever she showed up, even though she didn’t actually do much (and that’s okay). The other actors were quite good as well, and somehow Michael Gambon as King George V captivated me quite well with his brief appearances.
Lastly, the music was quite good. I’m not really sure why I find it good, because it just seemed like the regular strings and piano, but it went very, very well with the film, and the musical direction felt quite spot-on. GJ Desplat.
Overall, a very solid film that deserves the praise it gets. However, after watching it I didn’t have a huge emotional reaction or any deep impression of it - I simply thought that it was very well done. Even though The King’s Speech didn’t do anything wrong, I just don’t have a strong liking for it. I appreciate it and like it, but it’s not my favourite or something that I would name off the top of my head when asked for my list of Best Movies Ever. 88/100